unilad homepage
unilad homepage
  • News
    • UK News
    • US News
    • World News
    • Crime
    • Health
    • Money
    • Sport
    • Travel
  • Music
  • Technology
  • Film and TV
    • News
    • DC Comics
    • Disney
    • Marvel
    • Netflix
  • Celebrity
  • Politics
  • Advertise
  • Terms
  • Privacy & Cookies
  • LADbible Group
  • LADbible
  • SPORTbible
  • GAMINGbible
  • Tyla
  • UNILAD Tech
  • FOODbible
  • License Our Content
  • About Us & Contact
  • Jobs
  • Latest
  • Archive
  • Topics A-Z
  • Authors
Facebook
Instagram
X
Threads
TikTok
YouTube
Submit Your Content
Trump threatens to break law over birthright citizenship as Supreme Court strikes down executive order
Home>News>Politics
Published 17:20 1 Jul 2026 GMT+1

Trump threatens to break law over birthright citizenship as Supreme Court strikes down executive order

The president is already making plans on how he might be able to work around the Supreme Court's ruling

Niamh Shackleton

Niamh Shackleton

google discoverFollow us on Google Discover
Featured Image Credit: Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images

Topics: Donald Trump, Politics, US News

Niamh Shackleton
Niamh Shackleton

Niamh Shackleton is an experienced journalist for UNILAD, specialising in topics including mental health and showbiz, as well as anything Henry Cavill and cat related. She has previously worked for OK! Magazine, Caters and Kennedy.

X

@niamhshackleton

Advert

Advert

Advert

Donald Trump has seemingly threatened to break the law in light of the Supreme Court ruling against him.

One of the first executive orders that president signed when he returned to office in January 2025 was to end birthright citizenship in America.

"Birthright citizenship is the principle that people born in the United States are Americans—full members of our society from the moment they are born," explains the American Immigration Council.

"It reflects a simple and powerful idea: if you’re born here, you belong here."

Advert

Birthright citizenship is part of the American constitution and has been since 1868 following the American Civil War.

Despite it being more than a century old, Trump still wanted to change the 14th amendment. In his executive order, the president wanted to change it so children born to people who are in the United States illegally or temporarily are not American citizens.

However, the Supreme Court ruled against him and his administration yesterday (June 30).

The Supreme Court has ruled against Donald Trump (Getty Stock Image)
The Supreme Court has ruled against Donald Trump (Getty Stock Image)

What the Supreme Court said

The court struck down the US president’s order by a vote of 6-3.

A bare majority of five justices, in an opinion written by Chief Justice John Roberts, held that the long-settled understanding of the 14th amendment makes a citizen of anyone born in the country, with very limited exceptions.

"Citizenship, then and now, was the right to have rights—to freely participate in our political community. The framers of the fourteenth amendment extended that promise to 'every free-born person in this land'," Chief Justice Roberts wrote for the court, citing congressional debate over the amendment.

"We keep that promise today."

The Republican president’s restrictions had been blocked by several lower courts and had not taken effect anywhere in the US.

Trump had made out that Congress can 'easily' change the 14th amendment through legislation (Alex Wong/Getty Images)
Trump had made out that Congress can 'easily' change the 14th amendment through legislation (Alex Wong/Getty Images)

What Trump has said in response

Trump said the decision was 'too bad for our country' and wrongly suggested that congress could 'easily' address it with legislation.

He penned on Truth Social: "The Supreme Court upheld Birthright Citizenship, which is too bad for our Country, but we can easily make it up in Congress through Legislation, with the support of the President, that has now been determined during this process.

"No long and unwieldy Constitutional Amendment is necessary! Congress should start TODAY to work on ending expensive and unfair to our Country, Birthright Citizenship. They will have my Complete and Total Support!"

However, Congress cannot makes changes to the constitution through ordinary legislation. Instead, it must follow the amendment process, despite the president saying that it wasn't necessary.

"A constitutional amendment requires a supermajority—two-thirds of both the House and Senate—to pass," New Republic explains.

"Alternatively, the issue could technically be put to a constitutional convention, though two-thirds of states would need to support the motion to have one at all, and any proposed changes to an amendment would still require ratification by three-fourths of the states."

Choose your content:

an hour ago
7 hours ago
  • Getty Stock Photo
    an hour ago

    18 men and women undergoing new experiment to reverse aging and cure disease - with very real risks

    The treatment could one day target the brain and liver - allowing us to live longer, healthier lives

    News
  • Justin Sullivan/Getty Images
    7 hours ago

    Taylor Farms to reportedly recall ingredients linked to ‘explosive diarrhea’ parasite

    1,644 cases and 94 hospitalizations have been linked to the outbreak

    News
  • (Photo by Kevin Carter/Getty Images)
    7 hours ago

    White House responds after teleprompter operator reportedly made over $100,000 betting on Trump's speeches

    Trump has previously publicly shouted out the employee, who has now been placed on leave

    News
  • Getty Stock Photo
    7 hours ago

    Health officials warn that people may dismiss 'routine stomach bug' for Cyclospora outbreak

    Cases of Cyclospora have been spreading across the US in recent months

    News
  • Trump could break the law with July 4 firework display he claims is 'largest in history'
  • Trump threatens to hit Iran 'hard again' hours after saying ceasefire is over
  • Trump might've just broken the law as people spot issue on $1 coin with his face on
  • Trump signs executive order to change marijuana law in the US and here's what it really means