• News
  • Film and TV
  • Music
  • Tech
  • Features
  • Celebrity
  • Politics
  • Weird
  • Community
  • Advertise
  • Terms
  • Privacy & Cookies
  • LADbible Group
  • LADbible
  • SPORTbible
  • GAMINGbible
  • Tyla
  • UNILAD Tech
  • FOODbible
  • License Our Content
  • About Us & Contact
  • Jobs
  • Latest
  • Topics A-Z
  • Authors
Facebook
Instagram
X
Threads
TikTok
YouTube
Submit Your Content
8 most dangerous places to live in the US if World War 3 breaks out as fears grow

Home> News> US News

Published 18:39 3 Mar 2026 GMT

8 most dangerous places to live in the US if World War 3 breaks out as fears grow

People are becoming wary the war could reach American shores

Gerrard Kaonga

Gerrard Kaonga

google discoverFollow us on Google Discover
Featured Image Credit: Mowj / Middle East Images / AFP via Getty Images / FEMA

Topics: News, US News, Israel, Iran

Gerrard Kaonga
Gerrard Kaonga

Gerrard is a Journalist at UNILAD and has dived headfirst into covering everything from breaking global stories to trending entertainment news. He has a bachelors in English Literature from Brunel University and has written across a number of different national and international publications. Most notably the Financial Times, Daily Express, Evening Standard and Newsweek.

Advert

Advert

Advert

World War 3 fears remain at an all-time high and we have enough data to know what states would be the least safe in the event of a nuclear attack.

With Israel and the US’ strikes on Iran, fears of a global conflict rivaling previous world wars are certainly bubbling over.

While there have always been fears of a new global conflict, the uncertainty of the current situation has left a lot of people on edge.

The biggest fear tends to stem from the idea that the next global war will result in the use of nuclear weapons between nations.

Advert

Although some people may be certain that a nuclear strike on the US would focus solely on causing the most death and destruction, that isn’t always the case.

It can often prove to be more strategic to attack a nations ability to defend itself or counter attack, in this case it would be targeting the many missile silos that the US has on land.

With this in mind, there are some states that would be a lot safer than others.

The locations a nuclear strike could target in the US - the yellow dots represent missile silos (Sébastien Philippe, Svitlana Lavrenchuk and Ivan Stepanov/Scientific American)
The locations a nuclear strike could target in the US - the yellow dots represent missile silos (Sébastien Philippe, Svitlana Lavrenchuk and Ivan Stepanov/Scientific American)

A fallout maps by the Scientific American magazine has previously shown just where would be the most impacted should there be a nuclear attack on missile silos in the U.S. heartland i.e Colorado, Wyoming, Nebraska, Montana and North Dakota.

A 2024 Newsweek report analyzing this map found that these 8 places would be the most affected by radiation exposure risk, and are therefore the most dangerous states to live in.

The eight places were:

  • Montana
  • Wyoming
  • Colorado
  • Nebraska
  • South Dakota
  • North Dakota
  • Iowa
  • Minnesota

On the flipside of this, there were 15 different states that were considered the ‘safest’ to live in, with all things considered.

Color represents the maximum exposure for each latitude and longitude, depending on wind directions on the day of a simulated attack in 2021  (Sébastien Philippe, Svitlana Lavrenchuk and Ivan Stepanov/Scientific American)
Color represents the maximum exposure for each latitude and longitude, depending on wind directions on the day of a simulated attack in 2021 (Sébastien Philippe, Svitlana Lavrenchuk and Ivan Stepanov/Scientific American)

They were:

  • Maine
  • New Hampshire
  • Vermont
  • Massachusetts
  • Rhode Island
  • Connecticut
  • New York
  • New Jersey
  • Pennsylvania
  • Delaware
  • Maryland
  • District of Columbia
  • Virginia
  • West Virginia
  • North Carolina
  • South Carolina
  • Georgia
  • Florida
  • Alabama
  • Mississippi
  • Tennessee
  • Kentucky
  • Ohio
  • Indiana
  • Michigan

With all of that said, no where is particularly safe if modern nuclear weapons are used in a global conflict, according to experts that spoke to the outlet.

John Erath, the Senior Policy Director for the Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation said: “While those who live near military facilities, ICBM silos in the Midwest or submarine bases along the coasts might bear the most immediate and severe consequences of a nuclear attack, there's no question: ANY nuclear war or weapons detonation would be bad for everyone.

“Nowhere is truly 'safe' from fallout and other consequences like contamination of food and water supplies and prolonged radiation exposure.”

Choose your content:

an hour ago
2 hours ago
  • Getty Stock Photo
    an hour ago

    Restaurant fined $28,000 after serving children insect repellent instead of cranberry juice

    The children were taken to hospital following the scary ordeal

    News
  • Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images
    an hour ago

    Donald Trump reveals he's 'cutting off all trade' with European country for not helping US military operation

    Donald Trump made the announcement during a conference in the Oval Office

    News
  • John Salangsang/Variety/Penske Media via Getty Images
    2 hours ago

    Christina Applegate details side effect of MS that stopped her from looking in the mirror for a year

    Applegate was diagnosed with Multiple Sclerosis in 2021

    Celebrity
  • Patrick T. Fallon / AFP via Getty Images
    2 hours ago

    How much you should be prepared to pay for gas as US-Iran conflict causes prices to surge

    Prices are expected to soar even higher as the week goes on

    News
  • Map reveals the 6 most dangerous places to be if WW3 breaks out amid Putin's major threat
  • Expert reveals five critical steps to take if US is hit with nuclear bomb as WW3 fears grow
  • Website reveals where nearest nuclear fallout shelters are if major US cities are bombed amid WW3 fears
  • Russia issues chilling new threat with 'Oreshnik' missiles as World War 3 fears grow