unilad homepage
  • News
    • UK News
    • US News
    • World News
    • Crime
    • Health
    • Money
    • Sport
    • Travel
  • Film and TV
    • Netflix
  • Music
  • Tech
  • Features
  • Celebrity
  • Politics
  • Advertise
  • Terms
  • Privacy & Cookies
  • LADbible Group
  • LADbible
  • SPORTbible
  • GAMINGbible
  • Tyla
  • UNILAD Tech
  • FOODbible
  • License Our Content
  • About Us & Contact
  • Jobs
  • Latest
  • Archive
  • Topics A-Z
  • Authors
Facebook
Instagram
X
Threads
TikTok
YouTube
Submit Your Content
Men could be fined eye-watering amount if caught 'ejaculating without intent of conceiving baby' in newly proposed bill

Home> News> US News

Updated 09:59 14 Feb 2025 GMTPublished 09:18 14 Feb 2025 GMT

Men could be fined eye-watering amount if caught 'ejaculating without intent of conceiving baby' in newly proposed bill

The bill will come into effect in July if passed

Callum Jones

Callum Jones

google discoverFollow us on Google Discover
Featured Image Credit: Getty Stock Image

Topics: Politics, Health, US News

Callum Jones
Callum Jones

Advert

Advert

Advert

A newly proposed bill could see men find an eye-watering amount if they are caught 'ejaculating without intent of conceiving a baby'.

Titled 'The Contraception Begins At Erection Act' - which legislators in Ohio and Mississippi are hoping to pass - would make it illegal for a man to ejaculate with no intention of conceiving a baby.

Both states have exceptions for sperm donation and if a couple use contraception. In Mississippi this would criminalise male masturbation; in Ohio this wouldn't be the case.

A summary of the Mississippi bill reads: "This bill, known as the 'Contraception Begins at Erection Act,' proposes to make it unlawful for a person to discharge genetic material (sperm) without the intent to fertilize an embryo, effectively criminalizing certain male reproductive behaviors."

Advert

While the bill wouldn't jail men, it would hand them hefty fines.

On the first offense, it would be $1,000, which would be raised to $5,000 for a second offense. And if it was to happen for a third time, the individual would have to fork out a whopping $10,000. The same fines would apply in both states.

As you might have gathered, the legislation is not entirely serious.

Men could face a hefty fine (Getty Stock Photo)
Men could face a hefty fine (Getty Stock Photo)

The Mississippi bill was put forward by lawmaker Bradford Blackmon, the bill would come into force on July 1, 2025, if signed into law by Gov. Tate Reeves - but as we say, this is extremely unlikely to happen.

Blackmon noted that many bills regarding reproductive rights are often targeted at women.

"All across the country, especially here in Mississippi, the vast majority of bills relating to contraception and/or abortion focus on the woman’s role when men are fifty percent of the equation," he wrote, as per NBC News.

"This bill highlights that fact and brings the man’s role into the conversation. People can get up in arms and call it absurd but I can’t say that bothers me."

The Ohio bill was brought by State Representatives Anita Somani, who has also been an OBGYN for 30 years, and Tristan Rader. They say it has been drafted in response to moves regulating women's bodies.

The bill was proposed by Mississippi lawmaker Bradford Blackmon (Bradford Blackmon/Facebook)
The bill was proposed by Mississippi lawmaker Bradford Blackmon (Bradford Blackmon/Facebook)

Representative Somani said: "You don’t get pregnant on your own. If you’re going to penalize someone for an unwanted pregnancy, why not penalize the person who is also responsible for the pregnancy?"

She emphasised that her aim is not to pass the bill, but to start a conversation

She added: "It’s more to make the statement and start the conversation. You know, I’m not here as an OBGYN, I’m not here to regulate reproductive rights, I’m here to show the absurdity of regulating anybody’s rights.”

Women's reproductive rights in the US have changed drastically in recent years — the biggest being the overturning Roe V. Wade ruling in 2022, which dated back to 1973.

The precedent had given women the right to have an abortion, with it now being illegal in ten states for women to have a termination, even if they have been raped.

Some of the bill's critics have taken it at face value, with Ohio State Republican Representative Austin Beigel saying: "It’s beyond ridiculous what’s going on here. It’s a mockery of the most basic biological concepts."

Choose your content:

an hour ago
2 hours ago
  • Daniel Heuer/Bloomberg via Getty Images
    an hour ago

    Body language expert breaks down Melania Trump's key authoritative signals during Epstein statement

    The First Lady of the United States made an unexpected public address about Jeffrey Epstein

    News
  • CFOTO/Future Publishing via Getty Images
    an hour ago

    World's longest outdoor escalator cost $23 million to build and 20 minutes to reach the top

    'Goddess' spans nearly 3,000 feet and rises 800 feet in elevation, but there's a slight catch

    News
  • SWNS
    2 hours ago

    Girl, 10, died after brain cancer symptoms were dismissed over iPad usage

    The sudden onset of concerning symptoms in a 10-year-old girl were dismissed at first, but they were a red flag for an aggressive cancer

    News
  • YouTube/ WITN-TV
    2 hours ago

    Chick-Fil-A employee makes shocking decision after finding $10,000 in restroom

    Jayden Cintron's Good Friday deed came with a reward

    News
  • Woman reveals how she paid off college debt with eye-watering amount of money by pretending to be Trump supporter
  • Americans could receive $1,200 each as update given on Trump's promise that's part of new bill
  • Bill Gates set to testify before Congress over Epstein relationship after details released in files
  • White House shares post with secret message if played in reverse