An experiment that was conducted back in the early 1920s is still shocking people to this day.
There have been dozens of controversial psychology experiments over the years.
Schrödinger's Cat remains as one of the most questionable experiments to have been conducted.
In simple terms, the experiment looked at quantum mechanics. Schrödinger said that if you place a cat and something that could kill the cat (a radioactive atom) in a box and sealed it, you wouldn't know if the cat were dead or alive until you opened the box therefore meaning that the cat was technically both 'dead and alive'.
Advert
Fortunately no real cats were actually used in the experiment meaning no living animals were harmed - but the same can't be said for The Landis Facial Expression Experiment.
Conducted in 1924, psychologist Carney Landis wanted to analyze if all humans made the same facial expressions when responding to the same emotions.
He was a Minnesota University graduate student and recruited several other psychology students to part take in his experiment.
Landis wanted to find repetitive patterns in people's facial expressions and drew lines on the research participants faces.
He then subjected them to different stimuli while taking pictures of their faces.
Initially said stimuli was completely harmless; they had to listen to jazz music, smell ammonia, read a passage from the Bible, for example.
Then things got a little darker and Landis showed them pornographic photos and gruesome medical photos.
This wasn't the worst part, however. For the grand finale participants were given a rat and a knife and were ordered to decapitate the rodent. If they refused to do so, Landis did it for them.
After this, people began to give him a series of complex emotions. Some people cried and gasped, while others laughed.
Despite putting the participants through all that, Landis' experiment didn't yield the results he'd wanted.
The psychologist went on to conclude that people's natural expressions 'showed great differences among themselves' and that there's no universal expression for emotions like fear or pain.
A century on from the questionable experiment and people are still talking about it.
Commenting on a YouTube documentary about it, one person said: "We learned about this in my research methods in psych class when discussing ethics in research. I couldn't believe it was a real thing."
Someone else hailed the rat element of the controversial experiment as a 'rather nasty bit of work', while another labeled the whole thing as 'twisted'.
Topics: Psychology, Science, History
Niamh Shackleton