An old pair of Levi's jeans caught people's attention when they sold for $100,000 at auction, and everyone has been left asking the same question.
No, it's not 'how do I sell my jeans for that much?', although that would be valid.
Advert
The thing is, these weren't any old used pair of jeans - they're actually believed to be the oldest pair of Levis to be sold at auction, thought to have been made as early as 1873.
It's worth noting that Levi Strauss & Co did not authenticate the jeans ahead of the sale, but the buyer was obviously confident enough in authenticity of the jeans to spend thousands of dollars on them.
Before being sold at auction, the jeans were owned by vintage fashion collector Brit Eaton - the same man who runs Durango Vintage Festivus; the annual vintage fashion festival where the auction was held.
Eaton had been involved in brokering the sale of the jeans to a customer in Japan about 10 years earlier, and following the success of his inaugural festival in 2022, he decided to fly overseas and buy them for himself.
Advert
He then put the jeans up for auction, where they were purchased by an anonymous online bidder based in Thailand.
Considering they're thought to be decades old, you won't be surprised to hear that the jeans weren't in the best condition when they were sold.
The bottom section of one of the legs is ripped and ragged; they appear dirty in some areas and faded in others - all in all making them much worse quality than the new Levis you can buy for much smaller amounts of money nowadays.
Advert
Still, the seller obviously wanted to have the jeans for themselves, leaving many people online wondering: why?
"What would the buyer use it for?," one curious X user wrote after hearing of the sale, while another echoed: "What’s the buyer going to do with it?"
"What would the buyer do with it?," asked a third.
Advert
Unfortunately, we can only guess at what the buyer is going to do with the jeans. Maybe frame them and hang them on the wall? Keep them on the coffee table as a conversation piece? Or, more simply, wear them?
Since the buyer chose to remain anonymous, we'll unfortunately probably never know for sure. But after paying $100,000 for them, all we can hope is that the jeans aren't gathering dust in a closet somewhere.
Emily Brown