A man who ended up creating a huge flood was accused of doing so just to delay his wife coming home so he could continue partying.
There are many tactics that can be used if you want to keep the night going, but I think most would agree that creating a flood so bad that it lasted five months and caused billions of dollars in damage is too far.
It sounds like a ludicrous idea, but Missouri man James Scott is accused of doing just that back in 1993.
Advert
Those who are keen on their history will know the year of The Great Flood.
While the flood itself took place in 1993, the cause of the flood actually resulted of what came previously in 1992.
A wet end to the year resulted in abnormally high soil moisture and reservoir levels in the Missouri and Upper Mississippi River basins.
Storms and heavy rainfall continued over the following months, and eventually the current became so strong that it blew out the levees - designed to hold back the river - from Iowa to Missouri.
Though more than 1,000 levees ultimately failed during the Great Flood, Scott was found guilty of breaking one of those levees.
Fingers point at James Scott
Attention on Scott began after he was interviewed by a local television station and revealed he'd seen seepage at one of the levees.
"I tried throwing sand bags, you know, and it didn't work," Scott said.
Noting the levee had last been inspected two hours before the breakage, authorities became suspicious and brought Scott in for questioning.
He was initially released, but he was arrested again in October 1993 on an unrelated burglary charge, and told police that he had removed several sand bags from the levee just before the flood, CourtTV reports.
Scott maintains his innocence
He claimed he'd only removed the bags to point out a problem area in the levee, but one witness later claimed that Scott had told his friends a different story.
Scott's wife at the time worked at a restaurant in Taylor, Missouri, and the witness claimed that Scott had told him that if his wife was stranded due to the water, he could 'party' and that it would 'create ideal fishing conditions'.
The state theorized that Scott was motivated to either remove or cut the plastic sheets on the levee before burrowing into the sand, causing water to rush in.
47 people died as a result of the flood and approximately 54,000 people had to be evacuated. Losses were estimated at between $15 to $20 billion.
Scott was consequently tried, convicted and sentenced of intentionally causing a catastrophe - a Class A felony.
He was sentenced to 20 years to life in prison, but in 2018, Scott conducted an interview in which he maintained his innocence.
Speaking to ABC17, he said: "I can’t sit here and prove to you that I did not break the West Quincy Levee. Yet, they never proved at my trial that I did. Because I did not break the West Quincy Levee.
"The judge said, ‘We found you guilty on circumstantial evidence.’ I’m thinking, ‘Yeah, I know you did.’ There was no solid evidence.”
The Missouri man continues to insist that the levee failure was simply the result of Mother Nature.
Topics: Crime, Environment, Nature
Callum Jones