• News
  • Film and TV
  • Music
  • Tech
  • Features
  • Celebrity
  • Politics
  • Weird
  • Community
  • Advertise
  • Terms
  • Privacy & Cookies
  • LADbible Group
  • LADbible
  • SPORTbible
  • GAMINGbible
  • Tyla
  • UNILAD Tech
  • FOODbible
  • License Our Content
  • About Us & Contact
  • Jobs
  • Latest
  • Topics A-Z
  • Authors
Facebook
Instagram
X
Threads
TikTok
YouTube
Submit Your Content
Wikipedia has spent years on redesign and no one's noticed it

Home> Technology

Published 15:28 19 Jan 2023 GMT

Wikipedia has spent years on redesign and no one's noticed it

And anyone who *has* noticed seems to hate it.

Ali Condon

Ali Condon

When's the last time you went down a good old fashioned Wikipedia wormhole?

Well, if you've done so in the last, say, 24 hours, you may have noticed some very subtle changes - though there's every chance you would have missed it.

For the first time in ten years, the internet's trusty digital encyclopaedia has gotten a makeover, and they're pretty ecstatic about it.

If you've quickly switched over to Wikipedia and are struggling to spot the difference, you wouldn't be the only one.

Advert

Have you noticed the differences?
M4OS Photos / Alamy Stock Photo

The new design, titled 'Vector 2022', has been in the works for years with 'Wikipedians', as they're known, pouring over every excruciating detail, every little critique, only for it to be totally brushed off by users.

Since it launched on Wednesday (18 January), people have either not noticed the design change at all, or completely rejected it.

"My work over the last 10 years is also barely noticeable," commented one user after the changes were announced.

Advert

"I just checked and looks exactly the same?" agreed another.

"I barely see a difference!" added a third.

For a project that had more than 200,000 words of feedback to sort through, that's got to sting.

So, what's actually changed?

Advert

This is what Wikipedia pages look like now.
Wikipedia

Well, you'll find there's a much more prominent search bar at the top of your screen, a sticky table of contents that remains visible as you scroll, and more obvious language switching tools.

But, perhaps the most notable difference, if any, is a whole lot more whitespace taking over the screen.

People - those who have actually noticed - do not like that detail. At all.

Advert

Thanks to the constantly visible table of contents on the left hand side of the screen, the main text on your Wikipedia page is now off-centre, leaving a huge portion of whitespace.

If you didn't notice it before, you definitely will now, and for that, I am sorry.

Thankfully, for those who have noticed the subtle differences, and hate them, there's a way to swap back to the original 'Vector 2010' design. All you have to do is scroll across to the side bar and click 'Switch To Old Look'.

And, if you want to go properly old-school - if you really have to be that person - you could even use the original 2001 version.

Advert

Of all the prep that went into creating Wikipedia's first new look in over ten years, the website is still missing the one thing that users have been crying out for - a dark mode feature.

"OK, but still no dark mode… how hard can it be, come on.." asked one of many disappointed users.

"Was hoping they’d give the people what they want: Toggle dark mode."

Maybe in another ten years?

Featured Image Credit: Ted Hsu / Alamy Stock Photo / Wikipedia

Topics: Technology

Ali Condon
Ali Condon

Ali is a journalist for LADbible Group, writing on all things film, music, and entertainment across Tyla, LADbible and UNILAD. You can contact Ali at [email protected].

X

@alicondon

Advert

Advert

Advert

Choose your content:

9 hours ago
2 days ago
  • 9 hours ago

    NASA astronaut shares exactly how much they get paid in a very blunt three–word statement

    Being a NASA astronaut may not be as lucrative as you'd imagine

    Technology
  • 2 days ago

    Harvard scientist proposes six-word message be sent to mysterious object aiming at Earth that he says is 'not natural'

    Physicist Avi Loeb shared his thoughts ahead of the object making its closest approach to the Sun

    Technology
  • 2 days ago

    Kodak gives sad update after one fatal mistake turned it from a $31,000,000,000 photography company to bankrupt

    Things aren't looking good for what was once one of the leading camera companies in America

    Technology
  • 2 days ago

    Scientists studying NASA’s James Webb Space Telescope discover black hole 300 million times bigger than the sun

    More could be out there in deep space

    Technology
  • How Bill Gates has spent his $153,000,000,000 fortune and what he plans to do with it when he's gone
  • Mind-blowing journey of man who has spent 27 years walking around the world using no transport
  • Woman with 'no symptoms' diagnosed with cancer after unusual test and has 7 organs removed
  • Apple spent $1,000,000,000 a year for ten years creating a product that will never release to the public