To make sure you never miss out on your favourite NEW stories, we're happy to send you some reminders

Click 'OK' then 'Allow' to enable notifications

Not now
OK
Advert
Advert
Advert

Mars declared unsafe for humans to live as no one can survive for longer than four years

Dominic Smithers

Published 
| Last updated 

Mars declared unsafe for humans to live as no one can survive for longer than four years

Featured Image Credit: Alamy / SpaceEnhanced / PandorumBS

For years, there's been talk of one day mankind living on Mars.

And in recent times, with the likes of Elon Musk seemingly on a one-man crusade to get there first, it looks like it might happen fairly soon.

But according to one of the most recent studies into the viability of human life on the Red Planet, it might not be as easy as you'd think.

Advert

Loading…

Yep, research carried out by team at UCLA looked to answer two key questions - the first being around the impact of particle radiation and whether it would pose too grave a threat to human life.

The second was whether the timing of a mission to Mars could protect astronauts and the spacecraft from radiation?

To answer both questions, the scientists used geophysical models of particle radiation for a solar cycle and models of how radiation could affect both human passengers and a spacecraft.

Advert

Now, the good news is that the answers to their two questions were 'no' and 'yes', respectively.

According to the scientists' calculations, the spacecraft should provide enough protection during the round trip to and from Mars for the astronauts.

Scientists believe missions to Mars shouldn't last more than four years. Credit: Plrang GFX/Alamy
Scientists believe missions to Mars shouldn't last more than four years. Credit: Plrang GFX/Alamy

However, if the material the spacecraft is built with is too thick, then it could actually increase the amount of secondary radiation.

Advert

They also noted that this would largely be dependent on the timing of the mission as well.

Researchers claimed the best time to leave Earth would be when the solar activity is at its peak.

This is because during the 'solar maximum' the most dangerous particles are deflected, thus shielding the astronauts from the worst of it.

On the other hand, the bad news is that experts recommended humans should spend no longer than four years on any mission to the planet.

Advert

According to the study, which was published in the Advancing Earth and Science Journal, beyond this point, the levels of radiation become unsafe.

The Red Planet. Credit: mikolajn/Alamy
The Red Planet. Credit: mikolajn/Alamy

It reads: "Our calculations clearly demonstrate that the best time for launching a human space flight to Mars is during the solar maximum, as it is possible to shield from Solar Energetic Particles.

"Our simulations show that an increase in shielding creates an increase in secondary radiation produced by the most energetic GCR, which results in a higher dose, introducing a limit to a mission duration.

Advert

"We estimate that a potential mission to Mars should not exceed approximately four years.

"This study shows that space radiation imposes strict limitations and presents technological difficulties for the human mission to Mars, such a mission is still viable."

Topics: News, Science, US News, NASA

Dominic Smithers
More like this
Advert
Advert
Advert

Chosen for YouChosen for You

News

Most gruesome shark attack in history saw 150 sailors eaten one by one

8 hours ago

Most Read StoriesMost Read

Harvard University's Taylor Swift course's entire year syllabus has been leaked

11 hours ago