unilad homepage
unilad homepage
  • News
    • UK News
    • US News
    • World News
    • Crime
    • Health
    • Money
    • Sport
    • Travel
  • Music
  • Technology
  • Film and TV
    • News
    • DC Comics
    • Disney
    • Marvel
    • Netflix
  • Celebrity
  • Politics
  • Advertise
  • Terms
  • Privacy & Cookies
  • LADbible Group
  • LADbible
  • SPORTbible
  • GAMINGbible
  • Tyla
  • UNILAD Tech
  • FOODbible
  • License Our Content
  • About Us & Contact
  • Jobs
  • Latest
  • Archive
  • Topics A-Z
  • Authors
Facebook
Instagram
X
Threads
TikTok
YouTube
Submit Your Content
Scarlett Johansson starred in the most expensive Super Bowl commercial ever made
Home>Celebrity>News
Published 15:13 8 Feb 2026 GMT

Scarlett Johansson starred in the most expensive Super Bowl commercial ever made

ScarJo's collaboration with husband Colin Jost saw a major tech company break the bank to afford its 30-second slot

Britt Jones

Britt Jones

google discoverFollow us on Google Discover
Featured Image Credit: JC Olivera/Variety via Getty Images

Topics: Amazon, Scarlett Johansson, Super Bowl, Money, US News

Britt Jones
Britt Jones

Advert

Advert

Advert

Scarlett Johansson was cast in the most expensive advertisement of all time for the Super Bowl, and the cost will blow you away.

Even though she just got knocked off the top spot for the highest grossing actress in the world, ScarJo still makes bank when she’s hired to do anything on the silver screen.

When it comes to the Super Bowl commercials, they are costly enough as buying a slot is considered to be prime real estate for advertisers.

Just last year, 127.7 million people tuned into the Super Bowl event, per AP, so you can only imagine the revenue companies can hope to receive from so many people watching their product on screen. That’s why millions of dollars can be spent on a single ad.

Advert

Which brings me to Amazon Alexa's ‘Mind Reader’ commercial, which stars the Marvel actress.

Scarlett Johansson and Colin Jost starred in Amazon's 2022 Super Bowl commercial (YouTube)
Scarlett Johansson and Colin Jost starred in Amazon's 2022 Super Bowl commercial (YouTube)

Having aired at the 2022 event, it apparently cost around $26 million to run during the game.

In the ad, Johansson and husband, Colin Jost, are sat on the couch as an Alexa device makes it known that it can read their minds by progressively making bolder and clearer hints.

It starts off with tiny little things, until it spills the beans on what the couple think of each other and things they’d rather keep to themselves, until it drives a wedge between the two.

According to Ad Age, the cost of a 30-second national Super Bowl LX spot has reached $8 million to secure, which is a lot of money for such a short amount of time.

However, Ro CEO Zachariah Reitano, revealed to Inc that the true cost is somewhere between $16 and $29 million due to other cost factors.

For just 30-seconds, he estimates a company would spend $7 to $10 million on the slot alone, and that doesn’t cover the $1 to $4 million production costs.

It also doesn’t cover the $1 to $5 million to secure actors either.

So, really, the minimum to hold that slot could cost $9 million, or a whopping $19 million - which is still cheaper than Johansson’s stint.

According to Statista, a Super Bowl 30-second ad would have cost a lot cheaper in 2002 and 2004, with it estimating a cost of $2.2 million.

From there, the price slowly climbs every year until it reaches its $8 million price tag this year.

However, some might be looking to use AI instead, to spend less on production costs, said Kenny Gold, managing director and head of social, content and influencer for Deloitte Digital.

“I believe we could possibly see our first truly AI-orchestrated, integrated 360 activation,” he explained to the Hollywood Reporter. “From concept testing and narrative optimization, to media sequencing, creator amplification, social remixing, and post-game commerce, AI will act as the connective tissue across TV, social, retail, and experiential,” Gold added. “And as recent AI-forward campaigns have shown, this won’t be risk-free: some brands will lean into overt AI use in their creative and accept potential backlash, while others will deploy AI more subtly behind the scenes to capture the upside without becoming the story.”

Choose your content:

an hour ago
5 hours ago
6 hours ago
  • Instagram/kykelce
    an hour ago

    Jason Kelce says daughters were 'so happy' with roles at Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce's wedding

    Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce wed on July 3 at Madison Square Garden

    Celebrity
  • Photo by Dia Dipasupil/WireImage
    5 hours ago

    Rosie O'Donnell on reuniting with her daughter in prison and their first long conversation in years

    The star reflected on 'unconditional love' and the toll years of family turmoil have taken on them both

    Celebrity
  • @restishistorypod
    6 hours ago

    Tom Holland apologizes to Tom Holland over awkward issue

    The Marvel star issued an apology to his name twin, Tom Holland

    Celebrity
  • Getty Images/Karwai Tang
    6 hours ago

    Jennifer Lopez faces backlash after people blast Wimbledon outfit choice

    JLo was seen sitting beside Tom Hiddleston and behind Andrew Garfield at the July 12 tennis event

    Celebrity
  • How much a Super Bowl commercial costs in 2026 as ad rates hit eye-popping record
  • Ring doorbell makes huge change after Super Bowl commercial was branded ‘dystopian’ with ‘terrifying’ new feature
  • Serena Williams' controversial weight-loss drug Super Bowl commercial branded 'disgusting'
  • Super Bowl commercial mocks Coldplay 'kiss cam' controversy as Pepsi throws shade at Coke