unilad homepage
unilad homepage
  • News
    • UK News
    • US News
    • World News
    • Crime
    • Health
    • Money
    • Sport
    • Travel
  • Music
  • Technology
  • Film and TV
    • News
    • DC Comics
    • Disney
    • Marvel
    • Netflix
  • Celebrity
  • Politics
  • Advertise
  • Terms
  • Privacy & Cookies
  • LADbible Group
  • LADbible
  • SPORTbible
  • GAMINGbible
  • Tyla
  • UNILAD Tech
  • FOODbible
  • License Our Content
  • About Us & Contact
  • Jobs
  • Latest
  • Archive
  • Topics A-Z
  • Authors
Facebook
Instagram
X
Threads
TikTok
YouTube
Submit Your Content
Insane cost it took to put man on the Moon shows why US hasn't done it again since
Home>Technology>Space
Published 16:27 22 Aug 2024 GMT+1

Insane cost it took to put man on the Moon shows why US hasn't done it again since

The Apollo Program set the US back a staggering amount of money

Niamh Shackleton

Niamh Shackleton

google discoverFollow us on Google Discover
Featured Image Credit: HUM Images/Universal Images Group via Getty Images / Aubrey Gemignani/NASA via Getty Images

Topics: Space, NASA, Moon, History, Science, Technology, Money

Niamh Shackleton
Niamh Shackleton

Niamh Shackleton is an experienced journalist for UNILAD, specialising in topics including mental health and showbiz, as well as anything Henry Cavill and cat related. She has previously worked for OK! Magazine, Caters and Kennedy.

X

@niamhshackleton

Advert

Advert

Advert

If you've ever wondered why the US have attempted to land on the Moon again, then the amount of cash they spent on Project Apollo will probably make you understand.

Project Apollo was created in 1961 all in a bid to beat the Soviets by landing on the Moon first.

As I'm sure you can imagine, the mission was no easy feat and it wasn't until eight years later that NASA successfully landed man on the Moon with Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin making history as the first astronauts to do so as part of Apollo 11.

Michael Collins was also up there with them and successfully piloted the spacecraft and got his crew safely back to Earth.

Advert

There were a further five spaceflights between then and 1972 that successfully landed on the Moon, but the US hasn't put a human on the lunar surface since.

As to why, the main reason all came down to funding.

Project Apollo had several important components to it, including building and up-keeping spaceships, covering the cost of launching the vehicles and things like ground facilities and people's wages.

With this in mind, it's understandable that the project wasn't a cheap mission to run and billions were spent over this time frame.

Buzz Aldrin pictured on the moon in July 1969.  (Heritage Space/Heritage Images/Getty Images)
Buzz Aldrin pictured on the moon in July 1969. (Heritage Space/Heritage Images/Getty Images)

According to new data from The Planetary Society, the US spent a staggering $25.8 billion on hardware, facilities, and overheads directly associated with Project Apollo between fiscal years 1960 and 1973 - a far cry from the $7 billion resident John F. Kennedy's government estimated it would cost.

This converted to inflation rates in 2020 would set the likes of NASA back around $257 million.

If you add Project Gemini and the robotic lunar program, both of which enabled Apollo, this total would come to an eye-watering $280 million when taking inflation into consideration.

The mission became increasingly more expensive as the years went on. For example in 1961 mission support and operations were reported to have cost $297,000 at time and by 1972 this had increased to $310,326,000, as per a 2022 study.

Neil Armstrong was officially the first man to walk on the moon. (Space Frontiers/Getty Images)
Neil Armstrong was officially the first man to walk on the moon. (Space Frontiers/Getty Images)

While Project Apollo has now ceased to exist, space exploration continues.

One key part of the globe's ongoing efforts to find out more about space is the International Space Station which has been visited by 280 individuals from 23 countries.

According to Space.com, the station costs about $3 billion per year for NASA to operate.

While still expensive, it's substantially less than the fees NASA racked up while running Project Apollo.

Choose your content:

8 days ago
13 days ago
15 days ago
17 days ago
  • Getty stock image
    8 days ago

    Little known iPhone trick can stop people from being able to snoop through your phone

    Apple actually built the feature for a completely different reason

    Technology
  • Marvel Rivals
    13 days ago

    New Captain America suit in Marvel Rivals video game sparks controversy with X-rated detail

    Captain America's celebrating the Fourth of July in a very unique way...

    Technology
  • David Paul Morris/Bloomberg via Getty Images
    15 days ago

    Mark Zuckerberg weighs in after Bill Gates predicts four jobs will survive AI

    Mark Zuckerberg was at odds with Bill Gates' claim that AI would take over the workforce

    Technology
  • Getty Stock
    17 days ago

    AI lists 10 jobs it's likely to take over as one layer of human workforce is 'shrinking'

    There are many concerns about AI, and one of them is whether it could take our jobs

    Technology
  • NASA is launching your name to the Moon and it's completely free
  • People are only just discovering the US wanted to nuke the moon for this terrifying reason
  • Astronaut shares historic message as Artemis II regains contact with earth after 40-minute blackout
  • The truth behind Earth’s newly discovered ‘second moon’ and why it won’t be here for long