unilad homepage
unilad homepage
  • News
    • UK News
    • US News
    • World News
    • Crime
    • Health
    • Money
    • Sport
    • Travel
  • Music
  • Technology
  • Film and TV
    • News
    • DC Comics
    • Disney
    • Marvel
    • Netflix
  • Celebrity
  • Politics
  • Advertise
  • Terms
  • Privacy & Cookies
  • LADbible Group
  • LADbible
  • SPORTbible
  • GAMINGbible
  • Tyla
  • UNILAD Tech
  • FOODbible
  • License Our Content
  • About Us & Contact
  • Jobs
  • Latest
  • Archive
  • Topics A-Z
  • Authors
Facebook
Instagram
X
Threads
TikTok
YouTube
Submit Your Content
Judge rules whether nude scene in Romeo and Juliet is considered child pornography
Home>News
Published 15:12 27 May 2023 GMT+1

Judge rules whether nude scene in Romeo and Juliet is considered child pornography

The stars of the 1968 film have argued that they were exploited

Ali Condon

Ali Condon

google discoverFollow us on Google Discover
Featured Image Credit: Paramount Pictures

Topics: News, US News, Film and TV

Ali Condon
Ali Condon

Ali is a journalist for LADbible Group, writing on all things film, music, and entertainment across Tyla, LADbible and UNILAD. You can contact Ali at [email protected].

X

@alicondon

Advert

Advert

Advert

A judge has ruled that the nude scene in the 1968 production of Romeo and Juliet was not considered child pornography.

The film's stars, Leonard Whiting and Olivia Hussey, were aged 16 and 15 respectively when the scene was filmed, and have since argued that they were exploited and sexualised as minors.

The scene in question includes one shot of Whiting's bare buttocks and another of Hussey's breasts.

The actors, who are now in their 70s, claimed that they were coerced by the film's director Franco Zeffirelli into filming the nude bedroom scene.

Advert

The film's stars have filed a lawsuit against Paramount Pictures.
Paramount Pictures

However, Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Alison Mackenzie has ruled in favour of the defendant, Paramount Pictures, by dismissing the lawsuit.

In her written decision, Judge Mackenzie said that the scene was protected by the First Amendment and that the film's stars "have not put forth any authority showing the film here can be deemed to be sufficiently sexually suggestive as a matter of law to be upheld to be conclusively illegal".

The judge added: "Plaintiffs’ argument on the subject is limited to cherry-picked language from federal and state statutes without offering any authority regarding the interpretation or application of those statutory provisions to purported works of artistic merit, such as the award-winning film at issue here."

She also noted that Whiting and Hussey had filed their claim too late as it didn't fall within the bounds of California law, which temporarily suspended the statute of limitations for child sexual abuse.

Superior Court Judge Alison Mackenzie has dismissed the case.
Paramount Pictures

The actors' attorney, Solomon Gresen, has denounced the judge's decision and stated that they plan to file another version of the lawsuit in federal court.

The new lawsuit will be based on the recent re-release of the film with 4k digital restoration - that came out in February - which Gresen believes would restart the statute of limitations.

"Children cannot consent to the use of these images," said the attorney.

"They’re profiting off these images without consent."

He added: "We firmly believe that the exploitation and sexualization of minors in the film industry must be confronted and legally addressed to protect vulnerable individuals from harm and ensure the enforcement of existing laws."

As part of their suit, both Hussey and Whiting submitted declarations to describe their experience while filming.

The actors claimed that Franco Zeffirelli, who passed away in 2019, had told them that they could wear flesh-coloured underwear for the scene, but on the morning of the shoot, he informed them that they would be wearing only body make-up.

The actors' attorney Solomon Gresen stated that they plan to file another version of the lawsuit in federal court.
Paramount Pictures

They claim that they were told cameras would be placed in a way that would not show the nudity, but they were instead filmed naked without their knowledge.

Seeking more than $500 million in damages, the two also stated that Zeffirelli warned them 'the picture would fail' if they didn't go along with it and film the nude scene.

UniLad has approached Paramount Pictures for comment.

Choose your content:

11 hours ago
12 hours ago
  • Mandel NGAN / AFP via Getty Image
    11 hours ago

    Trump claims 'vandals' slashed Reflecting Pool he previously described as knife-proof

    Atlantic Industrial Coatings who did the renovation have acknowledged 'some parts need repair'

    News
  • Getty Stock
    11 hours ago

    Extreme heat can make these four common health conditions worse, according to experts

    Some parts of America are may exceed temperatures of 100°F in the coming days

    News
  • Ahmad Alameen/NurPhoto via Getty Image
    12 hours ago

    FIFA bans World Cup commentator from working on any more matches after on-air outburst

    Jorge 'Chipi' Vera has been stripped of his accreditation after an extraordinary live broadcast meltdown

    News
  • Pete Kiehart for The Washington Post via Getty Images
    12 hours ago

    Karoline Leavitt sparks backlash after defending Trump's $14 million Reflecting Pool project

    After a $14m renovation, the Reflecting Pool has turned green and the floor has started peeling

    News
  • ‘All my Children’ and ‘Superman’ actor Paul Avery killed alongside wife in devastating house fire
  • Actress in disturbing scene when she was 13 wins battle to have film removed 50 years later
  • All the horrifying details of Taylor Parker crime scene that were left out of Maternal Instinct
  • Actor in movie franchise that caused people to vomit in cinemas sues over nude scene